Raedex Consortium Ltd

Under investigation 16 March 2021

FRN: 668924

You might be eligible for compensation

Raedex Consortium Limited (Raedex) was part of an investment scheme where customers invested in car leases through Buy 2 Let Cars Ltd and Rent 2 Own Cars Ltd. Customers invested money into the scheme through Buy 2 Let Cars Ltd which is not FCA authorised. However, the cars purchased with this money were then leased to customers by Raedex – which is authorised by the FCA.

On 19 February 2021, the FCA stopped Raedex from entering into any new car leases, while allowing existing lease agreements to continue.

Raedex then appointed RSM UK on 16 March as administrators of Raedex, Buy 2 Let Cars Ltd and Rent 2 Own Cars Ltd.

We will provide frequent updates on the progress of our investigation on this page, so please sign up for email updates below if you would like to receive these by email.

 

Latest updates

  • 31 May, 2024

    FSCS is now open to claims against Raedex Consortium Ltd (Raedex) involving investments in the Raedex investment scheme that was conducted through Buy 2 Let Cars Ltd.

    Background

    Raedex was incorporated on 15 January 2012. Raedex was part of a group. The other entities in the group were:

    1. Buy 2 Let Cars Ltd (B2L). Buy 2 Let Cars Ltd was not regulated by the FCA. Raedex was the sole shareholder of Buy 2 Let Cars Ltd; and

    2. Rent to Own Cars Ltd (R2O). Rent 2 Own Cars Ltd was not regulated by the FCA. Raedex was sole shareholder of Rent 2 Own Cars Ltd.

    There was also PAYGO Cars Ltd (PAYGO Cars). PAYGO Cars Ltd was regulated by the FCA. Mr Reginald Larry-Cole, a joint director of Raedex, was the majority shareholder of PAYGO Cars Ltd.

    In summary, the Raedex investment scheme would work as follows:

    1. B2L would seek loans from investors, which it then passed onto Raedex and R2O via intercompany loans. R2O would then use the loans from the investors to purchase vehicles that were then licensed to Raedex. Raedex would then lease these vehicles out to consumers using the trading name ‘Wheels4Sure’. PAYGO Cars sold second-hand vehicles, believed to be vehicles that had been previously leased to consumers by Raedex; and

    2. Money paid by those leasing the vehicles would be collected by Raedex with the intention that B2L would repay the investors the money due to satisfy repayment obligations under terms of the loan agreements they had entered into. Depending on when the investors invested, some investors were repaid the sums due under the terms of their loan agreements in full, some only received part payments, and some did not receive any payments.


    The outcome of FSCS’s investigation

    In FSCS’s view, the Raedex investment scheme was a Collective Investment Scheme (CIS). Raedex did not hold the required FCA authorisations to operate a CIS. FSCS is satisfied that Raedex may owe some investors a civil liability, however, each claim submitted to FSCS will be assessed on its merits under FSCS’s rules.

    Who can make a claim against Raedex?

    FSCS will accept claims from customers who invested money in the Raedex investment scheme via Raedex itself or B2L. FSCS protection does not cover lending or credit broking, so we are not able to accept claims against Raedex from customers who entered into car lease agreements through Wheels4Sure or those who purchased vehicles from PAYGO Cars, nor does our coverage extend to customers who may have claims against those entities direct.

    The investors in Raedex fell into two categories, retail investors and corporate investors (e.g., limited companies and special-purpose vehicles). Investors must be deemed eligible under our rules to proceed with their claims. Only retail investors are likely to meet the eligibility criteria to proceed with their claim against Raedex.

    FSCS is aware that some investors who invested in the Raedex investment scheme were repaid the sums due under the terms of the loan agreements in full. Investors who were repaid the sums due under the terms of their loan agreements in full are unlikely to be eligible for compensation from FSCS.

    Complaints to the Financial Ombudsman Service

    FSCS is aware that some investors have submitted complaints to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) against financial institutions, including banks, which investors used to invest in the Raedex investment scheme.

    FSCS and the FOS are separate and operationally independent organisations, and the rules governing whether a person is eligible to receive compensation from FSCS are separate to those which apply to the FOS.

    FSCS will consider the claims submitted to it under the rules set for FSCS by the FCA. Further, the complaints submitted to the FOS and the claims submitted to FSCS relate to different entities: the complaints submitted to the FOS are against banks and financial institutions, whereas the claims submitted to FSCS are against Raedex.

    Investors can pursue a complaint to the FOS and a claim to FSCS against Raedex. However, should an investor receive compensation from FSCS for their claim against Raedex, they may be required to pay any further compensation to FSCS that they receive from their bank or financial institution (including as a result of any FOS award) in connection with the Raedex investment scheme.

    This is because once FSCS pays an investor compensation for their claim against Raedex, the investor’s legal rights are transferred to FSCS. This allows FSCS to try and recoup our costs and avoids investors being compensated for the same issue twice.

    FSCS will inform the FOS of compensation paid by FSCS to eligible customers who submit claims to FSCS against Raedex.

    Next steps

    FSCS will consider each claim submitted to it against Raedex involving the Raedex investment scheme under its rules as set for FSCS by the FCA.

    If you think you have a claim against Raedex, please submit your claim via our online portal.

     

  • 07 Mar, 2023

    FSCS’ investigation into the failure of Raedex remains ongoing. Our work with the IP (RSM UK Restructuring Advisory LLP) is progressing and they are considering a number of points we have asked for input on, and to help with our investigation.

    This will help FSCS determine whether protected claims exist under our rules, as set for FSCS by FCA, and  for eligible customers. As explained previously, this is a complex investigation due to the various entities involved with the Redex group and therefore, the investigation will take time to conclude.

    We will provide further updates on this page in due course.

    Thank you for your patience while we continue our investigations into the firm.

  • 11 Nov, 2022

    The FSCS investigation into the failure of Raedex remains ongoing. We're currently working closely with the insolvency practitioner RSM UK Restructuring Advisory LLP to obtain more documentation. This will help with our investigation into whether customers have valid claims with FSCS.

    Due to the nature of the firm’s operation, this is a complex investigation involving various entities within the Raedex group.

    We will provide further updates on this page in due course.

    Thank you for your patience while we continue our investigations into the firm.

  • 22 Jun, 2022

    Our investigation into whether FSCS protection may exist for customers of Raedex is ongoing. We’re still working closely with Raedex’s insolvency practitioner (RSM UK Restructuring Advisory LLP) to investigate whether there are valid claims.

    We will provide further updates in due course.

  • 11 Nov, 2021

    On 9 April 2021, the SFO announced that it is investigating suspected fraud in relation to the activities of the Raedex Consortium, including the companies Buy2Let Cars, PayGo Cars, Raedex trading as Wheels4Sure and Rent2Own Cars, in the period 2012 to 2021.  

    The SFO is now asking for investors to fill in a confidential questionnaire by 7 January 2022. The information provided will help the SFO to continue to progress its investigation.  

  • 03 Aug, 2021

    We continue to investigate whether there are valid claims against Raedex. To make a determination, we have to look into some complex issues so our investigation may take some time. We will continue to post updates on this page as soon as we have them.

  • 15 Mar, 2021

    FSCS is not currently accepting claims against Raedex. 

    Firstly, we need to establish whether there are valid claims against the firm. For this to happen we need to know that Raedex owes a civil liability to customers that would mean that it could be sued in court. 

     

FSCS

Contact us on the number below or via any of the methods on our Contact us page.

Phone contact icon 0800 678 1100